zondag 31 mei 2015

Frank Ho 2


Beste Frank,

Jouw email maakt me erop attent dat ik tot nu toe niet duidelijk genoeg heb gemaakt wat mijn motieven zijn om aandacht te blijven besteden aan Henk Hofland en Geert Mak. Deze twee oudere blanke heren uit 'onze' christelijke cultuur zijn inderdaad niet 'belangrijk' genoeg om langere tijd te bekritiseren, ware het niet dat ik ze slechts als voorbeeld gebruik van het morele, politieke, economische, financiële en culturele failliet van mijn generatie en in mindere mate de generatie die daaraan vooraf ging, en waartoe Hofland behoort. Zij mogen als oppervlakkige individuen dan wel onbelangrijk zijn, maar niet als representanten van de westerse kleinburger die vrijwillig en tot nu toe consequentieloos voor de economische en politieke macht hebben gewerkt. 

Ik schrijf mijn kritieken niet om hen en hun aanhang te overtuigen dat feiten doorslaggevender zijn dan meningen. Deze mensen zullen nooit het inzicht verwerven van bijvoorbeeld de Angelsaksische historicus Ronald Wright die schreef: 'If civilization is to survive, it must live on the interest, not the capital, of nature.' Ikzelf ben er diep van doordrongen dat Heidegger gelijk had toen hij zei:

Geen enkel individu, geen enkele groep van mensen, geen enkele commissie van nog zo vooraanstaande staatslieden, onderzoekers en technici, geen enkele conferentie van leidinggevende personen uit het bedrijfsleven en de industrie vermag het historisch verloop van het atoomtijdperk te remmen of in een bepaalde richting te leiden. Geen enkele louter menselijke organisatie is in staat, de heerschappij over dit tijdperk te verweren.

De technocratische cultuur is al te ver doorgeschoten om aan andere richting te kunnen uitgaan, de technologie heeft zo'n krachtige dynamiek weten te genereren dat het autonoom is geworden en de mensheid meesleurt naar de afgrond. Het was Friedrich Nietzsche die als eerste besefte dat op die wijze het nihilisme zijn intrede had gedaan in de westerse cultuur. En 'Was bedeutet Nihilismus? - Dass die obersten Werte sich entwerten. Es fehlt das Ziel. Es fehlt die Antwort auf das ‘Wozu?’ 

In De Zaak 40/61. Een reportage (1961) wees Harry Mulisch op het feit dat Nietzsche in een brief aan zijn vriend Overbeck had geschreven: 

Mir besteht mein Leben jetzt in dem Wunsche dass es mit allen Dingen anders gehen möge, als ich sie begreife; und dass mir jemand meine 'Wahrheiten' unglaubwürdig mache.

aangezien '[d]eze waarheid, die niemand hem ongeloofwaardig heeft kunnen maken, bestond uit het besef dat God dood is, dat de bovenste waarden zich ontwaarden en dat het nihilisme voor de deur staat: 'der unheimlichste aller Gäste,' 

waaraan Mulisch toevoegt: 

uit de puinhoop er van verrees niet zo zeer een nieuwe moraal voor het individu, als wel een moraal van de rangorde der individuen, met alle implicaties van teling en geweld: de bovenste mag doden, de onderste moet sterven.

En dat is precies hetgeen waar we vandaag de dag getuige van zijn, en wat journalisten als John Pilger het postmoderne fascisme betitelen. Waarom schrijf ik dan nog, als ik niet mijn gedachten formuleer om mensen te overtuigen? Het antwoord is simpelweg: ik schrijf voor mijn kinderen en vooral ook mijn kleinkinderen, van wie ik zielsveel hou. Om hen na mijn dood te kunnen vertellen dat er altijd mensen zijn geweest die de moed en eerlijkheid hebben opgebracht om de werkelijkheid te zoeken, in een poging de waarheid te vinden. Daarom citeer ik zo vaak schrijvers die ik bewonder. Ik wil mijn verwanten via een boek dat ik later dit jaar ga samenstellen, laten zien dat er wel degelijk mensen waren die ervan doordrongen waren dat de westerse cultuur failliet was en dat die individuen gebruik maakten van de enige vrijheid die de mens bezit, namelijk: nee te zeggen, zoals Steef Davidson mij vele jaren geleden ooit eens vertelde. Terug praten, niet in de verwachting dat je daarmee macht of invloed verwerft, maar om te laten zien dat een bestaan zonder waarden betekenisloos is. 'De wereld van de mens is de wereld van de betekenis. Deze gedoogt de dubbelzinnigheid, de tegenstrijdigheid, de waanzin of de verwarring, maar niet een gebrek aan betekenis. Zelfs de stilte is bevolkt met tekens,’ aldus de grote Mexicaanse dichter Octavio Paz. Wie zwijgt stemt toe. Een mens is verplicht zijn stem te verheffen, wil hij niet in het nihilisme wegzinken. Vandaar dat ik intellectuele collaborateurs als Hofland en Mak nodig heb om te laten zien dat het wel degelijk anders kan. Beste Frank, ik hoop dat ik nu duidelijker ben geweest. Vriendelijke groet,

Stan.


Aat Veldhoen, die de schitterende ets hierboven heeft gemaakt, samen met zijn geliefde Hedy d'Ancona, twee goede vrienden van me. 




Frank Ho

Gisteravond laat ontving ik de volgende e-mail. Ik heb de auteur gevraagd of ik zijn opmerkingen mocht plaatsen, en het antwoord was: ja. 

Beste Stan,

Graag zie ik je stukken voorbij komen, die ik vervolgens vaak ook lees. Ik ontvang newsfeeds van veel nieuwsbronnen die jij ook graag citeert en kan rustig stellen dat de overlap in interesse en opinievorming tussen ons groot is. Daar houdt het zo'n beetje op, want een schrijver ben ik niet. Een groot twitter-account over 9/11 heb ik inmiddels wel opgebouwd en dit vermeng ik met media-aangelegenheden (vooral propaganda aspecten) en kwesties als MH17 en Oekraïne. O ja, die site natuurlijk, heb ik ook: waarheid911.nl

Bij het dagelijks zoeken naar nieuwigheden die binnen mijn focus vallen, zie ik jouw vele artikelen passeren, vaak overgenomen van buitenlandse min of meer onafhankelijke bronnen, maar ook de bijna dagelijkse updates over Hofland, Geert Mak en wellicht andere clowns die de status quo in NL op een intellectueel verantwoorde manier intact houden.

Wat ik wil zeggen is dit: Je maakt ze veel te belangrijk.

In mijn perceptie heeft het vele schrijven over deze treurige fossielen uit het verleden het onbedoelde effect van een bewieroking, waarmee juist deze oude mannen die hun ziel verkochten aan de gevestigde orde (en juist daarmee hun podium ophoogden ter veredeling van zichzelf en het zichzelf omhoog stekende deel van ons stemvee) een eer te beurt valt die ze bij lange na niet verdienen.

Mensen als Hofland, Mak, Maarten van Rossem en andere treurwilgen in ons medialandschap zouden hun 'uitstraling' en bereik niet hebben wanneer ze lak hadden aan het beperkte spectrum dat ze door de belangrijkste mediakanalen is opgelegd. Niet zozeer als harde censuur, maar als zelfcensuur, omdat ze drommels goed weten dat ze anders in de marge waren gedrukt, hun podium zouden zijn kwijtgeraakt. Zij weten dit net zo goed als dat bijvoorbeeld Chomsky dat over zichzelf weet.

Chomsky's prachtige uitspraak, 'The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum,' is natuurlijk een 1,2tje voor elke ouwe rot die zich in het journalistieke vak omhoog heeft gehoereerd en daarom tot vervelends toe te zien en te horen mag zijn. Dit geldt ook voor Chomsky zelf, die zich dit principe van levendig debat zonder het establishment ooit werkelijk te bedreigen als geen ander heeft eigen gemaakt. Daarmee is hij de perfecte gatekeeper geworden van elk officiële meme die indien ontkracht werkelijk de regels van het spel zou veranderen. Een leuke aanwijzing voor het feit dat Chomsky de status quo afschermt door kritisch te zijn is wel zijn volgers-bestand. Ik heb het dan niet over Twitter, waar subscribers volgers worden genoemd, nee, Chomsky heeft nauwelijks kritische mensen om zich heen. Hij is de guru van een kritische pseudo-progressieve klasse die zijn trouwe volger is en zich vooral graag met hem associeert. Tekenend hierbij is dat Chomsky zich hiertegen nooit heeft verzet. Dat hele Chomsky-idioom, met het gemurmel en dat ironisch snijdende commentaar dat nergens over gaat, met hier en daar een briljante volzin die helaas nooit eindigt in het verbale schaakmat van ons verziekte systeem, is een bijna religieuze opvoering waarmee een groot deel van onze linkse 'intelligentsia' in slaap wordt gehouden. Daarom houden ze ook zoveel van hem.

Het feit dat dit soort mannen (allemaal mannen? kan bijna niet kloppen) zichzelf ondanks hun scherpe geest en journalistieke gave hebben verkocht omwille van de pseudo-liefde die ze ontvangen in de vorm van publieke bevestiging en straks misschien een mooie begrafenis, is toch zeker in- en in-triest? Wie zou het als springlevende krijger niet verkiezen om te mogen sterven in het harnas van een oprechte journalistiek strijd? Journalistiek zoals deze is bedoeld, een strijd om waarheidsvinding, om de officiële machten te controleren en in democratische balans te houden? Is het niet verschrikkelijk dat de angst van deze lieden voor vergetelheid het gewonnen heeft van hun vaak briljante flair in combinatie met een vakkundig schrijverschap? En dat ze met de hierdoor gemaakte keuzes gedoemd zijn ten onder te gaan in vorm, in plaats van in de kern van hun oorspronkelijke passie?

In plaats van de strijd die nu harder nodig is dan ooit (infowar), maakte deze na-oorlogse generatie de vreselijke keuze om hun gewonnen krediet na een vruchtbare carriere om te ruilen voor zilverstukken. Kwesties waaronder hun ouders wellicht hebben geleden, en waarvoor zij na de oorlog vochten met hun pen als zwaard, weg te geven aan de hoogste bieders, die in feite beter georganiseerd en machtiger zijn dan de nazi's in WOII. Klinkt cru, maar het briljante van de huidige machtsstructuren is dan ook hun volstrekte gebrek aan profilering in de leidende media, die ze dan ook - bijna letterlijk en figuurlijk - in hun bezit hebben.

Mensen die capituleerden terwijl hun 'legacy' naderde op het moment dat ze karakterologisch gedoemd waren om tegen de grote stroom in te gaan, zijn van alle tijden. Het is niets om jaloers op te zijn. Onlangs met de media-aandacht over de 50 jaar herdenking van de moord op JFK viel mijn bek open toen ik Peter R. de Vries in DWDD hoorde verklaren dat de documentaire die hij tien jaar eerder had gemaakt over JFK, bij nader inzien toch onjuist bleek te zijn en dat de officiële lezing de meest waarschijnlijke was!

Hoe kun je langdurig onderzoek doen naar de moord op JFK, naar Amerika gaan, tal van betrokkenen interviewen en vervolgens vasthouden aan de officiële verklaring? Ik heb zelf grondig de omstandigheden rond 9/11 onderzocht en bij veel details tast ik nog steeds in het duister, maar die doen er niet toe wanneer je zoals ik, en zoals Peter R. de Vries met zijn JFK onderzoek, de juistheid van een officiële verklaring onderzoekt. Daarvoor hoef je slechts een peiler van dat onderzoek grondig onderuit te halen en het hele plaatje stort in. Nu zijn daar zowel bij 9/11 als bij JFK meerdere peilers die het begaven. De Vries' capitulatie voor de waarheid rond JFK bewijst dat hij oneerlijk is. Of dat is om zijn carrière te sparen of omdat hij onder hoge druk staat dan wel gechanteerd wordt, dat kan ik niet beoordelen. Maar zijn teruggrijpen naar de officiële absurde verklaring van de Warren Commissie, met alle kennis die hij opdeed, dat is volstrekt ongeloofwaardig. Zijn veelvuldige verschijnen op televisie inclusief zijn morele verontwaardigingen en ander theater is natuurlijk symptomatisch voor de hele toestand waarin de 'prestitute' media verkeerd. Het is één grote comedie, zij het wel een zwarte.

Ik besluit met mijn wens dat je spoedig onder dat hele Hofland en Mak gedoe een vette streep trekt en gewoon je eigen onbezoedelde kracht blijft gebruiken als één van de zeer weinige echte journalisten die NL nog rijk is, al zal je daar weinig applaus voor krijgen. Maar zo werkt dat nu eenmaal!

Vriendelijke groet,

Frank Ho

Ik zal morgen een antwoord formuleren op Frank's e-mail.


U.S. Hegemony?


Western Long Knives Out for FIFA’s Sepp Blatter? US Wants Russia’s Status as World Cup 2018 Host Rescinded

Global Research, May 29, 2015
sepp-blatter-reputation-ethics-fifa
separate article discussed US Justice Department indictments against 14 current and former FIFA officials.
Blatter wasn’t named but isn’t out of the woods. US prosecutors indicated what’s announced isn’t “the final chapter. It is not over,” they said.
FBI Director James Comey indicated “work will continue until all of the corruption is uncovered and a message is sent around the world.”
Swiss Attorney General spokesman Andre Marty said Blatter “could be questioned. (E)very person involved in the allocation of the World Cups might be questioned.”
What’s going on appears more than what meets the eye. US officials want Russia’s status as World Cup 2018 host country rescinded.
Israel wants Palestinian efforts to suspend it from FIFA competition quashed – because of unacceptable abuses committed against its footballers.
Blatter may be today’s Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who was IMF managing director from November 2007 – May 2011. Washington wanted him ousted for urging austerity conditions imposed on countries receiving IMF loans be softened. He publicly opposed making ordinary people pay the price for financial crisis conditions caused by banksters and other corporate crooks. He was also favored to be elected French president over America’s choice.
He was set up, unjustly framed in a sex scandal. Washington got corporatist Christine Lagarde appointed IMF chief. Right-wing Nicolas Sarkozy became French president.
Is history repeating? Instead of a sex scandal, its FIFA corruption with Washington overstepping by acting outside its legal jurisdiction.
FIFA officials charged aren’t US citizens. They don’t live in America. Blatter is a Swiss national. In June 1998, he was elected FIFA president.
He was reelected three times. He’s up for a fourth on Friday, May 29.
Britain’s Tory MP Damian Collins called him “the most despicable man in sport.” He urged new votes for 2018 and 2022 World Cup host nations – challenging current ones Russia and Qatar respectively.
UK Prime Minister David Cameron called for Blatter’s resignation. He supports his opponent – Jordanian Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein.
He’s FIFA vice president for Asia. He has close Western ties. In January, he announced he’d challenge Blatter for FIFA’s top post.
In response to US corruption charges, he said “(w)e cannot continue with the crisis in FIFA, a crisis that has been ongoing and is not just relevant to the events of today.”
“FIFA needs leadership that...accepts responsibility for its actions and does not pass the blame.”
European football association UEFA head Michel Platini called for Blatter to step down.
He wants Friday’s election postponed. So does French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. Platini blustered “(w)e cannot continue like this.”
If Blatter is reelected he threatened UEFA would consider pulling national teams out of FIFA.
“(A) majority” of UEFA associations will vote for Ali,” he said, if elections proceed.
English Football Association (FA) chairman Greg Dyke said “Blatter has to go. He either has to go through a resignation, or...be out-voted or we have to find a third way.”
“(D)amage...done to FIFA...can’t be rebuilt while (he’s) there so EUFA has got to try to force him out.”
Credit card giant Visa said it would “reassess our partnership (if) swift and immediate steps to address (ongoing) issues aren’t taken. It stopped short of calling for Blatter’s resignation.
FIFA sponsors Adidas and Coca-Cola called for its reform. Hyundai Motor and Anheuser-Busch expressed concern. McDonald’s said it’s monitoring the situation.
Long US knives got Strauss-Kahn ousted on fabricated charges to install Washington’s favorite.
FIFA corruption isn’t new. Is Blatter heading for the same fate using extrajudicial FBI indictments as a pretext?
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected]. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.” http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.htmlVisit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.
Copyright © 2015 Global Research

Spike Lee




Photo

On Chicago’s South Side, Arrealle Mayfield posed for a picture with her father, Clarence Mayfield, before her senior prom. The director Spike Lee plans to film “Chiraq,” a move about gun violence on the South Side, in Chicago this summer. CreditJoshua Lott for The New York Times 

CHICAGO — In his 1914 poem, an admiring Carl Sandburg called Chicago the “City of the Big Shoulders,” a proud label for the working people who called it home. During the winter of the polar vortex 100 years later, as temperatures dipped below zero and bitter winds whipped off Lake Michigan, miserable Chicagoans quipped that they were living in Chiberia.
Now this city is contending with a newer, grimmer label: Chiraq.
A reference to the gun violence that has left parts of Chicago feeling like a war zone to many residents, the word is believed to have been coined by local rappers years ago. But it is taking on another life as the working title of a new Spike Lee movie that is expected to be filmed here this summer.
Local politicians have lined up against the title. Mr. Lee has been confronted by Chicago’s mayor, Rahm Emanuel, who told him in a meeting last month that he was “not happy” about the name.
An alderman from the South Side, William Burns, was so perturbed by the title that he angrily suggested that Mr. Lee, the renowned director of films like “Do the Right Thing” and “Malcolm X,” should not get the $3 million tax credit that he is seeking for filming here.

Photo

The scene of a shooting in in May in Englewood, a South Side neighborhood.CreditJoshua Lott for The New York Times 

And even on the city’s crime-plagued South and West Sides, where most of Chicago’s gang warfare occurs, some residents who are accustomed to seeing, hearing and reading about violence said they had mixed feelings about a movie starring their city called “Chiraq.”
“I don’t embrace the title,” said Janelle Rush, a 24-year-old student, as she walked through the Auburn Gresham neighborhood on the South Side on a recent afternoon. “But I think it’ll be good to showcase the parts of the city that the media really don’t show. I’m hoping that he can maybe flip it around and show it in a positive light as well. To show that we’re more than just Chiraq.”
Mr. Lee, who declined to be interviewed, has not publicly confirmed the title of the movie, but city officials who have met with him said he had told them that he intended to call it “Chiraq.” The film, Mr. Lee has said, is focused on gun violence on the South Side; some reports, unconfirmed by Mr. Lee, offer the intriguing possibility that the film is a comedic reimagining of “Lysistrata,” the ancient Greek tale by Aristophanes in which women withhold sex to force the men to end the Peloponnesian War.
Gun violence is a way of life for many Chicagoans, especially in pockets of the South and West Sides. Street gangs have splintered and multiplied in recent years, complicating police efforts to tamp down crime. Every year, warm weather brings increased gunfire and gang activity, as well as a drumbeat of headlines announcing each weekend’s alarming tally: Over Memorial Day weekend, at least 56 people were shot in Chicago, 12 fatally.
As of May 17, the city had 133 murders this year, a 17 percent increase over the same period last year.

Photo

Mr. Lee at a news conference in May to discuss the film. He was accompanied by parents whose children had died in gun violence. CreditBrian Jackson/Sun-Times Media, via Associated Press 

The seemingly intractable violence has tormented residents on the South Side, where Mr. Lee is planning to do most of his filming.
“I said in that meeting, ‘A lot of people take offense to the term Chiraq,’” Mr. Burns said in an interview. “These are communities where people are doing the right thing, people trying to have a decent neighborhood. Having a movie called ‘Chiraq’ will make it much more difficult for folks like me and other aldermen to bring economic development to those neighborhoods. Who wants to live in a place that people call Chiraq?”
In response, Mr. Burns said, “Spike and his people were like: ‘Oh, you shouldn’t be offended. It’s going to be fine.’”
Mr. Lee appeared in Chicago in May to try to calm the furor, holding a news conference outside St. Sabina Church on the South Side. Dozens of bystanders craned their necks for a look, snapped photos and cheered at his arrival. Mr. Lee, surrounded by parents whose children died in gun violence, wore tortoiseshell glasses, a cherry-red tie and, at times, a look of wry impatience.

Photo

The Rev. Michael Pfleger, the pastor of St. Sabina Church in Chicago, has lent Mr. Lee office space for the film. “There’s been a huge amount of controversy and outrage over a movie title," he said. "Where is the outrage over the violence?” CreditJoshua Lott for The New York Times 

“A lot of people have opinions about the so-called title of the film who again, know nothing about the film,” Mr. Lee said. “Way, way back when I made ‘Do the Right Thing,’ there were people who said this film would cause riots all across America, that black people were going to run amok. They wrote a whole bunch of things.
“But those people ended up being on the wrong side of history,” he continued, “And the same is going to happen in Chicago. They are going look stupid and end up on the wrong side of history. We’re here for peace.”
To the people who have expressed displeasure over the movie, he said: “Wait until the movie comes out. You don’t like it, you don’t like it, but see it first.”
Also at Mr. Lee’s side was John Cusack, who grew up in a Chicago suburb and will appear in the film. “I love my city of Chicago,” he said, taking the microphone. “And I would never do anything to hurt it.”
One fan of Mr. Lee’s who was there, Lamar Brown, 29, a marketing director, said he had recently stood in line to audition as an extra for the film.
“I’m fine with the title,” said Mr. Brown, who grew up in Englewood, a South Side neighborhood. “This is not a laughing matter here, this senseless violence going on. We just need to portray the realism of this. People are losing their lives over jealousy, hatred. I understand the message he’s trying to bring to us.”
The Rev. Michael Pfleger, the pastor of St. Sabina, who is known for his emotional sermons and outspoken political views, has lent Mr. Lee office space to use as a home base while in Chicago, he said in an interview.
“I hope the film will face head on this violence that’s really becoming a genocide, and cause us to hold up a mirror to it,” Father Pfleger said. “There’s been a huge amount of controversy and outrage over a movie title. Where is the outrage over the violence? It is unacceptable to me.”

Century of War

A Century of War

 91 
  18  5 
 
  343
hiroshima_survivors
Photo: Hiroshima survivors.
July 28 marks WWI’s 100th anniversary. It was called the war to end all wars. Never again was heard.
In 1928, Kellogg-Briand policy renounced aggressive wars. The UN Charter’s Preamble states:
“We the Peoples of the United Nations Determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind…”
America, key NATO partners and Israel wage them on humanity. They’re ongoing in multiple theaters. They cause horrific human suffering.
America waged wars at home and/or abroad every year in its history. They began long before the republic’s inception.
It’s an unparalleled record. It’s shocking. It’s deplorable. It continues out-of-control. Peace never had a chance. It’s more endangered than ever.
Wars assure more of them. America by far is the world’s leading offender. Israel, Britain, France and other key NATO partners are willing partners. So are other rogue states.
Barbara Tuchman’s “The Guns of August” recounted WW I horrors. Events were fast-moving. Things spun out-of-control.
Over 20 million died. Many more were wounded or disabled. An entire generation of young men was lost.
Two decades later it repeated threefold. Never again became permanent war. It rages on humanity. Both world wars were preludes for what followed.
All wars include horrendous atrocities. America’s tortured past reflects some of the worst.
They predate the republic. Accused 17th century Salem witches faced horrific abuse. Trials were grueling. They excluded fairness. Death by hanging awaited those convicted.
One or more victims were crushed under heavy boulders. It’s unknown if any were burned alive.
Native Americans were mass-murdered. Columbus exterminated Hispaniola’s population.
He did so by by torture, mass-murder, forced labor, starvation, disease, despair, stabbing natives for sport, dashing babies’ heads on rocks, letting children be eaten by dogs, beheadings, and burning people at the stake among other atrocities.
Ward Churchill documented America’s genocide. Native peoples were reduced to at most 3% of their original numbers.
According to Churchill:
Millions were “hacked apart with axes and swords, burned alive and trampled under horses, hunted as game and fed to dogs, shot, beaten, stabbed, scalped for bounty, hanged on meathooks and thrown over the sides of ships at sea, worked to death as slave laborers, intentionally starved and frozen to death during a multitude of forced marches and internments, and, in an unknown number of instances, deliberately infected with epidemic diseases.”
America’s genocide remains unparalleled in history. It repeats in new forms. It did so throughout the last century. It continues now.
A century of war begot a second one. New millennium conflicts rage. They show no signs of ending. They’re ongoing in multiple theaters.
Torture and atrocities are weapons of war. John Dower’s “War Without Mercy” documented viciousness by both sides in the Pacific. America is as unprincipled as the worst of its adversaries.
US forces mutilated Japan’s war dead. They did so for souvenirs. They sank hospital ships. They shot sailors trying to abandon them.
They murdered pilots who bailed out. They killed wounded soldiers. They tortured prisoners. They killed them in cold blood.
They buried combatants alive. They attacked civilians. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are two of history’s greatest crimes.
Gratuitous slaughter describes them. They had nothing to do with defeating Japan. Nor did firebombing Tokyo. America bears full responsibility for numerous crimes of war, against humanity and genocide.
Post-9/11, some of the worst occurred. Others happened earlier. Millions of North Koreans and Southeast Asians were slaughtered.
Air war alone killed millions of civilians. North Korea became rubble. Virtually everything in northern and central areas were destroyed. Napalm, cluster bombs, chemical and biological weapons, as well as other terror ones were used.
US forces dropped threefold the amount of WW II tonnage on Southeast Asia. Agent Orange’s deadly legacy remains.
Dioxin is one of the most deadly known substances. It’s a potent carcinogenic human immune system suppressant. Minute amounts cause serious health problems and death.
Agent Orange causes congenital disorders and birth defects. It causes cancer, type two diabetes, and numerous other diseases.
It remains toxic for decades. It killed millions of Southeast Asians. Many others were disabled and/or suffer from chronic illnesses. Future generations are affected like earlier ones.
Around three million US servicemen and women were harmed. So were many American civilians. Many died. Living victims endure diseases, birth defects, and other ill effects.
New generations of terror weapons replaced earlier ones. US wars are merciless. Fundamental laws are ignored. Anything goes is policy.
Civilians suffer most. America considers them legitimate targets.
Obama’s Asia pivot perhaps intends repeating the worst of past and current conflicts. They’re ongoing in multiple war theaters.
Washington’s new millennium wars killed millions. Many more victims die daily. Wherever America shows up, mass slaughter, destruction and human misery follow.
War without mercy describes them. America is a killing machine. Making the world safe for war profiteers is policy. So is committing genocidal crimes.
The measure of national policy is its respect for life, liberty, equity and justice. America deplores them. It scorns them. It ruthlessly seeks unchallenged global dominance.
It thrives on war. It wages permanent ones. Its culture reflects violence, unfairness, cruelty and intolerance. It punishes its own. It does so like others abroad.
Torture is official policy. It’s practiced worldwide. It operates the world’s largest gulag. Thousands of political prisoners suffer inside. Anyone challenging US lawlessness is vulnerable.
So are America’s poor, people of culture, others most disadvantaged, and human rights advocates championing their rights.
America is a dystopian wasteland. Millions are denied fundamental rights. Growing poverty, unemployment, underemployment, hunger and homelessness reflect horrific conditions.
Hot wars rage abroad. Financial ones cause more harm than standing armies. Bipartisan complicity wages war on fairness.
America’s social contract is on the chopping block for elimination. Growing millions face protracted Depression conditions.
Families struggle to pay rent, provide sustenance, and handle other essential expenses. Harvard Magazine’s January-February 2014 issue featured Elizabeth Gudrias’ article.
It headlined “Disrupted Lives.” It discussed Harvard Sociology Professor Matthew Desmond’s research. His academic interests include poverty, race, ethnicity, organizations and work, social theory and ethnography.
He studied how evictions impact America’s poor. It’s a story raw datta hide. Sheriffs arrive disruptively. They’ve come to evict. Loud knocks announce them. If no one’s inside they “kick the door in.”
Desmond studies how poverty, housing and eviction affects America’s most disadvantaged. Millions are horrifically harmed.
He captured an important snapshot. He did it through original research. It reflects hard times getting harder. It’s ongoing out of sight and mind.
It’s longstanding. It’s raged since 2008 crisis conditions emerged. For growing millions, it never ends.
Imagine living life on the edge. Imagine it without house or home. Desmond witnessed what happened to Danielle Shaw and her partner, Jerry Allen.
“(D)eputies swept into (their) apartment,” said Gudrias. They took over. They “briskly outlined” their intentions.
“The couple could choose to put their belongings in storage at the moving company’s warehouse – and pay a fee to retrieve them – or the movers would leave everything on the curb.”
The couple had little advance notice. They learned only days before eviction. They had little time to plan.
Desmond’s research showed “how common eviction is in the lives of poor people,” said Gudrias.
Inner city people of color are harmed most. They have no recourse. Their lives are involuntarily disrupted.
Desmond studied inner city Milwaukee. He analyzed formal eviction court records. Others take place off the books.
Some landlords are adversarial. They cut off electricity. They stop  heat in winter. They remove front doors. They use other ways to evict tenants.
Desmond found almost one in eight Milwaukee renters were evicted or involuntarily relocated. For blacks, it was one in seven. For Hispanics, it was one in four.
Many end up homeless. Some live on streets. Others end up in shelters. Ones finding substitute housing “are limited to decrepit units in unsafe neighborhoods.”
Transient existence affects children’s emotional well-being. Their school performance suffers.
Adults endure “depression and subsequent job loss, material hardship, and future residential instability,” said Desmond.
Eviction compounds poverty and racial discrimination. “We are learning that (it) is a cause, not just a condition, of poverty,” he said.
It gets little public attention. Most often it gets none at all. Imagine millions suffering enormous hardships. Imagine federal, state and local governments doing practically nothing to help.
Imagine mainstream media ignoring what need to be headlined. Imagine a growing problem across America.
“The average cost of rent, even in high-poverty neighborhoods, is quickly approaching the total income of welfare recipients,” said Desmond.
“The fundamental issue is this: the high cost of housing is consigning the urban poor to financial ruin.”
Desmond was a University of Wisconsin-Madison doctoral student. Eviction “brings together poor and nonpoor people – tenants, their families, landlords, social workers, lawyers, judges, sheriffs – in relationships of mutual dependence and struggle,” he explained.
He learned how little eviction was studied. No national data exist. He constructed Milwaukee facts and figures on his own.
He did it by examining tens of thousands of Milwaukee County eviction records.
He interviewed 250 tenants in eviction court. He conducted over 1,000 others with affected households.
He calls evictions and incarceration twin destructive forces. They relate to each other. They affect millions of inner-city lives.
They’re out of sight and minds. They’re nameless, faceless victims society forgot.
Many prior inmates can’t find work. Others don’t earn enough to live on. Criminal records are marks of cain. They’re permanent. They affect victims for life.
Their ability to rent is hampered. Desmond lived in poor neighborhoods he studied. He learned human suffering firsthand. He explained, saying:
“I sat beside families at eviction court; helped them move; followed them into shelters and abandoned houses; watched their children; ate with them; slept at their houses; attended church counseling sessions, Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, and Child Protective Services appointments with them; joined them at births and funerals; and generally embedded myself as deeply as possible into their lives.”
He discovered numerous cases where victims don’t know their rights. They don’t understand the process. They’re given conflicting, inaccurate information.
They lack legal help. They’re on their own. They’re up against an unforgiving system. Disadvantaged people endure what America’s privileged avoid.
Poverty is a process, he says. It involves victims, a system creating them, people benefitting from it, and society overall not caring.
Sociology Professor Eric Klinenberg admires his writing skill. It’s “deceptively simple but devastatingly sharp,” he said.
He’s a voice for the voiceless. He lets them be heard. He explains their humanity. It needs to be known.
He hopes to make a difference. Disadvantaged households need all the help they can get.
America’s wars include waging them on poor people. They’re increasingly deprived. Force-fed austerity inflicts greater harm. It’s ongoing when help is most needed.
Main Street economic recovery is nowhere in sight. Hard times for millions keep getting harder.
Federal, state and local governments dismissively ignore them. Today’s America is the United States of I Don’t Care.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.


Mossad Blackmailed Bill Clinton

  https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1791684742297067853 Jake Shields @jakeshieldsajj The Israeli Mossad recorded phone calls of a sexual n...