vrijdag 9 februari 2007

Iran 100

'Tomgram: Over the Cliff with George and Dick?
Thelma and Louise Imperialism
Over the Cliff with George and Dick?
By Tom Engelhardt

Let me make an argument about Bush administration Iran policy -- about the possibility that a regime-change-style, shock-and-awe air assault might someday be launched on Iranian nuclear facilities and associated targets -- based on no insider knowledge, just the logic of George-and-Dick's Thelma-and-Louise-style imperialism.
Of course, we all know at least half the story by now. Is there anybody in official Washington -- other than our President, Vice President, the Vice President's secretive imperial staff, assorted backs-against-the-wall neocon supporters lodged in the federal bureaucracy, and associated right-wing think tanks -- who isn't sweating blood, popping pills, and wondering what in the world to do about our delusional leaders?
You only have to pick up the morning paper to find the most mainstream of official types in an over-the-top mode that, bare months ago, would have been confined to the distant peripheries of political argument. There's Senator Joe Biden, the very definition of a mainstream man, grilling Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice about whether she believes the administration already has the authority to attack Iran and swearing, if she does, that it "will generate a constitutional confrontation in the Senate, I predict to you." (You can add the exclamation point to that comment or to similar ones from the likes of Senators James Webb and Chuck Hagel among others.) Or how about Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on presidential pronouncements in January?
"Much has been made about President Bush's recent saber rattling toward Iran. This morning, I'd like to be clear: The President does not have the authority to launch military action in Iran without first seeking Congressional authorization -- the current use of force resolution for Iraq does not give him such authorization."
Former officials are now crawling out of the Washington woodwork to denounce Bush/Cheney policy in Iraq and Iran with the fervor (however masked by official Washington language) of an exorcism. There, for instance, is former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski in front of Congress, more or less predicting the end of the Roman… sorry, the American empire:
"The war in Iraq is a historic, strategic, and moral calamity. Undertaken under false assumptions, it is undermining America's global legitimacy. Its collateral civilian casualties as well as some abuses are tarnishing America's moral credentials. Driven by Manichean impulses and imperial hubris, it is intensifying regional instability… If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large… A mythical historical narrative to justify the case for such a protracted and potentially expanding war is already being articulated…"
There are three retired high military officials, Army Lt. Gen. Robert Gard (former assistant to Defense Secretary Robert McNamara), U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Joseph Hoar (former Centcom commander), and Navy Vice Adm. Jack Shanahan issuing a public letter insisting that attacking Iran "would have disastrous consequences for security in the region, coalition forces in Iraq and would further exacerbate regional and global tensions." There's Paul Pillar, former CIA analyst for the Middle East, in the Washington Post warning: "Avoiding the next military folly in the Middle East requires that the agenda for analysis and debate not be so severely and tendentiously truncated as before Iraq."
Even Secretary of State Rice, new Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and hardline National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley seem to be exhibiting a certain degree of anxiety, sending back the intelligence dossier gathered by our embassy in Baghdad on Iranian interference in America's Iraq. (You know, "foreign" interference on our home turf.) Assumedly, this was because the latest doctored intelligence, claiming the Iranians are supplying advanced IED technology that is causing American deaths looks as hollow as the administration's cherry-picked and doctored intelligence on Iraqi WMDs before the 2003 invasion.
On the face of it, as Juan Cole long ago pointed out at his Informed Comment website, there's something suitably George-and-Dick wacky about claims like this, implying that the Iranians are arming the Sunni insurgency. How times have changed, however. Unlike in 2002-2003, officials and former officials are finally making such points in very public ways. Take, for instance, Bruce Riedel, a former top Middle East expert on the National Security Council, who recently bluntly told USA Today, "There is no evidence that the Sunnis are being assisted by Iran."
The Rice/Gates/Hadley send-back may, of course, turn out to be little more than the Iranian equivalent of Secretary of State Colin Powell sending back similarly wacky administration claims about Iraqi WMD before preparing his infamous UN presentation that led to the invasion of 2003. But if so, there's certain to be a lot more mainstream skepticism, criticism, and noise this time around.'

Lees verder: http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?emx=x&pid=164164

1 opmerking:

Anoniem zei

Het is wel een beetje oftopic Stan, maar ik wilde je DEZE niet onthouden!

'CIA financierde Bilderberg Groep'


AMSTERDAM - De Amerikaanse inlichtingendienst CIA financierde en organiseerde mede de eerste edities van de Bilderbergconferentie.

Dat stelt dr. Gerard Aalders van het Nederlands Instituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie (NIOD). Aalders verrichtte de afgelopen jaren een uitgebreide archiefstudie naar de geschiedenis van de Bilderberg Groep.

De Bilderberg Groep is een in 1954 mede door prins Bernhard opgericht genootschap dat bestaat uit vooraanstaande personen uit de wereld van de politiek en industrie. De groep komt jaarlijks in een luxueus hotel achter gesloten deuren bijeen om te brainstormen over de internationale politieke en economische ontwikkelingen.

De wetenschapper beroept zich onder meer op originele documenten van de Bilderberg Groep zelf die hij heeft gevonden.

Over zijn bevindingen verschijnt medio maart een boek bij Uitgeverij Van Praag. Volgens Aalders is 98 procent van de bronnen waar hij zich op baseert nog nooit eerder gepubliceerd. Een groot aantal van de door hem gevonden documenten wordt ook in het boek afgebeeld.

Communistische gevaar
''Bernhard heeft zich voor het karretje van de CIA laten spannen'', stelt Aalders. De betrokkenheid van de Amerikaanse overheid in de Bilderberg Groep is nooit eerder bewezen. ''De relatie tussen Europa en Amerika holde begin jaren '50 achteruit. Amerika zag het als cruciaal belang om de invloedrijkste Europeanen te doordringen van het communistische gevaar.''

Overigens kan Aalders niet bewijzen dat Bernhard af wist van de steun die de CIA aan de conferenties verleende. ''Maar het lijkt me zeer waarschijnlijk'', stelt hij. ''Hij was in die jaren goed bevriend met twee opeenvolgende CIA-directeuren.'' (ANP)

© Het Parool, 09-02-2007

Peter Flik en Chuck Berry-Promised Land

mijn unieke collega Peter Flik, die de vrijzinnig protestantse radio omroep de VPRO maakte is niet meer. ik koester duizenden herinneringen ...